RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS: WORKING PAPERS

Significance of most-favoured-nation terms in global trade: A comprehensive analysis

The Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) principle has historically been instrumental in promoting stability and equitable trade conditions. In recent decades there has been a rise in bilateral and regional trade agreements, which deviate from the MFN principle in providing more favourable tariff treatment to specific partners. At the same time, WTO Members can, under certain circumstances, raise trade barriers against imports for different reasons, including to counter unfair trade practices.

Using a novel and comprehensive dataset based on customs data submitted by WTO Members to the WTO's Integrated Database and complemented by other sources, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of global merchandise trade flows under both MFN and preferential tariffs. The methodology takes into account trade remedies, including anti-dumping and countervailing duties, additional duties in the US and China, and the utilization of trade preferences by incorporating preferential tariffs and bilateral trade flows for 184 economies. The research highlights the nuanced effects of MFN trade across different economies, regions, product and income groups, and compares MFN treatment on imports and exports. The paper concludes that more than 80% of global trade in goods is conducted on MFN terms and underscores the continued importance of the multilateral framework for the global trading system.

Staff Working Paper: Research ERSD-2025-02

Authors: Tomasz Gonciarz, Thomas Verbeet

Manuscript date: 15 January 2025

Key Words: World Trade Organization; International Trade; Most-Favoured-Nation; Regional Trade Agreements; Preferential Trade Arrangements; Preference Utilization; Trade remedies; Antidumping and Countervailing Duties.

 

JEL classification numbers: F13, F14, F15, F53

 

back to top

Disclaimer 

This is a working paper, and hence it represents research in progress. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors. They do not represent the positions or opinions of the WTO or its Members and are without prejudice to Members' rights and obligations under the WTO. Any errors are attributable to the authors.

Download paper in pdf format (32 pages opens in a new window)